Decision Maker: Central Sydney Planning Committee
Decision status: Recommendations Determined
Moved by the Chair (the Lord Mayor), seconded by Mr Webster -
It is resolved that consent be granted to Section
4.55 Application No. strikethrough, as follows:
(A) Amend Condition (2) (a) to insert the following revised plans:
Drawing
Number |
Architect |
Date |
MP-100-006 Rev H I K L |
Turner
Koichi Takada Architects and Silvester Fuller |
22
February 2017 13
August 2018 21
November 2018 11
December 2018 |
MP-250-101 Rev G I J |
Turner
Koichi Takada Architects and Silvester Fuller |
17
February 2017 21
November 2018 11
December 2018 |
MP-350-101 Rev G K I J |
Turner
Koichi Takada Architects and Silvester Fuller |
17
February 2017 15
October 2018 21
November 2018 11
December 2018 |
(B)
Amend condition 9 (a) to amend the maximum
parapet and top of building heights for building C:
Building
component |
Top
of the parapet (AHD) |
Top
of the building component (AHD) |
Building C - Lot 12a |
2 storey component 33.300 3 storey component 36.400 4 storey component 39.500 5 storey component 42.600 6 storey component 45.700 |
2 storey component 33.900 3 storey component 37.000 4 storey component 40.900 5 storey component 43.200 6 storey component 46.300 |
Building C - Lot 12b |
7 storey component 48.800 8 storey component 51.900 9 storey component 55.000 |
7 storey component 51.130 8 storey component 54.430 9 storey component 55.600 |
Building C - Lot 12c |
19 storey component 85.500 20 storey component 89.850 |
19 storey component 86.600 20 storey component 91.000 |
(C) Amend
Condition (63) to delete the requirement for a signage strategy to be submitted
with the detailed design application for building C as follows:
(63) SIGNAGE STRATEGY
A detailed signage strategy shall be submitted with each Stage 2 development application with the exception of building C. The signage strategy must include information and scale drawings of the location, type, construction, materials and total number of signs proposed for the development.
The application is recommended for approval for the following reasons:
(A) The development as modified is substantially the same as was originally approved and is consistent with the requirements of Section 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
(B) The variations to the maximum height of buildings development standard, height in storeys control and maximum parapet and top of building heights under Condition (9) of the concept consent will not adversely impact the desired future character and amenity of the surrounding area. In particular, the modifications do not preclude the development potential of neighbouring sites with regard to solar access.
(C) The building envelope as amended continues to achieve design excellence with regards to the provisions of Clause 6.21 of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 having regard to the desired future character of the Lachlan Precinct, the relationship to surrounding buildings and the public domain.
(D) The development is in the public interest.
Carried unanimously.
D/2016/1450/F
Report author: David M Zabell
Publication date: 09/05/2019
Date of decision: 09/05/2019
Decided at meeting: 09/05/2019 - Central Sydney Planning Committee
Accompanying Documents: