Use the below search options at the bottom of the page to find information regarding recent decisions that have been taken by the council’s decision making bodies.
28/04/2021 - Development Application: 63 Kensington Street, Chippendale - D/2020/1455 ref: 2794 Recommendations Determined
Decision Maker: Local Planning Panel
Made at meeting: 28/04/2021 - Local Planning Panel
Decision published: 28/04/2021
Effective from: 28/04/2021
Decision:
The Panel
(A) noted and supported the comments of the Design Advisory Panel Residential Subcommittee of 2 March 2021;
(B) noted the inadequate provision of bicycle parking having regard to the lack of motorcycle parking; and
(C) refused
consent for Development Application No.
(i) The proposal has not demonstrated that the boarding house would provide sufficient amenity for future occupants, in that:
(a) the application has not demonstrated that appropriate acoustic conditions would be provided for boarding rooms and living areas;
(b) the application has not provided communal living areas or private open space in accordance with the provisions of State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009; and
(c) the proposal has not demonstrated that it would provide suitable waste facilities.
(ii) The proposal has not demonstrated that it would appropriately conserve the heritage significance of the existing building.
(iii) The proposal has not demonstrated that the site is suitable for the proposed development.
Carried unanimously.
D/2019/1455
Lead officer: Shannon Rickersey
28/04/2021 - Development Application: 262 Liverpool Street, Darlinghurst - D/2020/1397 ref: 2793 Recommendations Determined
Decision Maker: Local Planning Panel
Made at meeting: 28/04/2021 - Local Planning Panel
Decision published: 28/04/2021
Effective from: 28/04/2021
Decision:
The Panel granted consent to Development Application
No. strikethrough):
(2) DESIGN MODIFICATIONS
The
following design modifications are to be submitted to, and are be approved by,
Council’s Area Planning Manager prior to a Construction Certificate for
these works being issued:
(a) The
whole of the proposed lift assembly including the lift shaft, doors, connecting
bridges, and handrails, proposed to the interior to the auditorium in the
current form is not approved. The design of the lift structure is to be amended
to ensure the lift assembly, car and bridges are as transparent as possible
so as to minimise its impact on the significance of the interior space. In
this regard and minimal including as follows:
(i) Within the auditorium space, the revised design for the lift assembly and connecting bridges is to be as transparent as possible, utilising clear glazing for the shaft, the lift car and lift doors, and the balustrades. Glazing should be frameless with the supporting structure, handrails and handrail supports located internal to the glazing.
(ii) The width of the bridges should be as minimal as feasible. The bridge floors should be glazed, with non-slip and obscure glazing as required. The suspended ceilings under the bridges are to be deleted. The main structural members could be inset so that the edges of the bridges are able to be as fine as possible. Consideration is to be given to glass beams.
(iii) The design of the structural members supporting the shaft and the bridges is to ensure the members are of a minimal cross-sectional size and that the profile of the members should be open rather than rectangular hollow sections. The glazing should be external to all structure and be frameless.
(iv) The handrails are to be designed to be as minimal as feasible and set behind frameless glazing, whilst complying with BCA and the Australian Standards. The material of the handrails is to be patinated bronze or an approved alternative.
(b)
The
applicant is to explore a design to conceal the kitchen exhaust riser through
the use of materials more sympathetic to the building.
(3)
DESIGN DETAILS
The following
design details are to be submitted to, and are be approved by, Council’s Area
Planning Manager prior to a Construction Certificate for these works
being issued:
(i)
the proposed wall panel installation in the
auditorium;
(ii)
the proposed operable curtain system dividing
the entry hall;
(iii) the
three pairs of double doors located within existing openings on the western
side of the entry hall providing access to the auditorium and the northern
stair lobby; and
(iv) the
commercial office partitions within the main auditorium which are to be as
transparent as feasible in
the upper mezzanine which are limited to a maximum height of 1.5 metres from
the finished floor level.
(4)
USE OF ENTRY HALL
(a) The Entry Hall (also known as the Great
Hall) shall only be used as an information and education facility as defined by the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 in association with the charitable
foundation use of the site.
(b) The entry hall must not be operated as a
function space for third party users that are not tenants of the site.
(c) Any uses associated with (a) above after
6.00pm where food and drinks are available, shall be limited to a maximum of
two (2) per calendar month.
(5) USE
OF ENTRY HALL KITCHEN
The commercial kitchen located in the
north-eastern corner of the site adjacent to the Entry Hall shall only be used
in association with the operation of the site and must not be utilised to
produce food for home delivery services.
Remaining conditions to be renumbered accordingly.
(29) TOILETS FOR FOOD HANDLERS
(a) Adequate
toilet facilities must be available for food handlers working for the food
business. Toilets and associated
facilities must be provided in accordance with AS4674 – Design, Construction
and Fit-out of Food Premises and the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code,
3.2.3 - Food Premises and Equipment.
(b) Details
of the location of toilets which are provided exclusively for the use of
food handlers and staff working at the business must be submitted for the
approval of the Accredited Certifier prior to the issue of a Construction
Certificate.
(c) The
toilet(s) must be provided with a hand wash basin, with hot and cold running
water mixed through a common spout, hand wash soap, hygienic hand drying
facilities and hands-free taps.
Reasons for Decision
The application was approved for the following reasons:
(A) The Panel is satisfied that the provisions of clause 5.10(10) of Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 have been met by the proposal.
(B) While office premises are not permitted within the R1 - General Residential zoning that applies to the site, the application is recommended for approval under clause 5.10.10 of the Sydney LEP 2012 as a positive heritage outcome is achieved.
(C) The proposed works are generally compatible with the heritage significance of the site, the exception being the proposed lift installation which is recommended to be addressed by conditions of consent.
(D) The proposed uses are capable of being carried out on the site without resulting in significant adverse impacts on the surrounding properties.
(E) With the exception of the kitchen exhaust all of the proposed works are internal to the existing building meaning that there are no additional bulk, overshadowing or streetscape impacts. Having regard to the matters listed in 6.21(4) of the LEP it is considered that the development (subject to conditions) exhibits design excellence.
(F) Approval of the application is in the public interest.
(G) Conditions 2 and 3 were amended to allow the fit out works already well advanced to continue.
(H) Condition 2(b) was added to mitigate the appearance of the kitchen exhaust riser, to be more sympathetic to the building.
(I) Condition 3(iv) was amended to maximise awareness of ceiling space.
(J) Condition 4(c) was added to preserve amenity for local residents.
(K) Condition 5 was added to prevent vehicles associated with food delivery services crowding adjacent roadways and footpaths.
(L) Condition 29 was amended to minimise any potential for unnecessary heritage impacts.
Carried unanimously.
D/2020/1397
Speakers
Mr Guy Luscombe (resident), Mr Rod Hanratty (resident), Mr Tim Brooker
(resident), Ms Erin Fairs-Scherer (resident), Ms Jennifer Duncan (resident), Mr
Nick Kidd (resident), Ms Kathryn Greiner (Paul Ramsay Foundation) – on behalf
of the applicant, and Ms Cindy Penrose (Paul Ramsay Foundation) – on behalf of
the applicant.
Lead officer: Patrick Quinn
28/04/2021 - Development Application: 119 Redfern Street, Redfern - D/2020/1158 ref: 2795 Recommendations Determined
Decision Maker: Local Planning Panel
Made at meeting: 28/04/2021 - Local Planning Panel
Decision published: 28/04/2021
Effective from: 28/04/2021
Decision:
Pursuant to Section
4.16(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Panel
granted deferred commencement consent to Development Application No. strikethrough):
(2) DESIGN MODIFICATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT
The proposal must be modified as
follows:
(a)
The
proposed copper louvres of the upper portion of the proposed lift core tower
are not approved. The tower capping above the brickwork base is to be clad in a
copper sheet that retains a visual solidity (whilst being perforated if
required) and faceting to provide an interpretation of the original faceted
copper dome on the clocktower. This is subject to any changes that may result
from the Section 60 approval;
(b)
The
proposed metal screen gate on the George Street elevation is to be redesigned
to a pattern that interprets the adjacent early railing and to include
components that are of a dimensional cross section and length more consistent
the components of the adjacent early railing. Main horizontal and vertical
lines should be respected;
(c)
The
proposal where it entails the removal of the eastern wall of the original rear
entry porch is to be redesigned to provide interpretation of the original
extent of the east wall by leaving the footprint of the wall in the south
return wall un-rendered and the brick keys evident;
(d)
The
proposed banner signs and supporting stem, and the fixings to the building and
in particular the clocktower wall, are not approved and are to be deleted from
the plans; and
(e)
The
proposed external lighting is not approved.
The modifications
are to be submitted to and approved by Council’s Area Planning Manager prior to
the issue of a Construction Certificate.
(32) HISTORIC
MARKER
A plaque of high-quality material (e.g. bronze
or stainless steel) describing the history of the site and building must be
installed on the facade of the building prior to an Occupation Certificate
being issued. The design, location and wording must be submitted for the
approval of Council’s Urban Design and Heritage Manager prior to manufacture
and installation. The marker is to be incorporated into the heritage
interpretation plan if a plan is required by this consent.
Reasons for Decision
The application was
approved for the following reasons:
(A)
The proposal
is consistent with the objectives of the B2 Local Centre zone contained within
the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012.
(B)
The proposal
is consistent with the objective of conserving the heritage significance of the
subject state heritage item and demonstrates design excellence in accordance
with Clause 5.10 and Clause 6.21 of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012.
(C)
Subject to
conditions, the development is consistent with the objectives of the Sydney
Development Control Plan 2012.
(D)
Heritage
Council NSW have issued General Terms of Agreement and these can be satisfied.
(E)
Based upon
the material available to the
(i)
the
applicant’s written request has adequately addressed the matters required to be
demonstrated by clause 4.6(3) of the Sydney LEP 2012, that compliance with the
height of buildings development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary and
that there are sufficient planning grounds to justify contravening clause 4.3
of the Sydney LEP 2012; and
(ii)
the proposal is in
the public interest because it is consistent with the objectives of the B2
Local Centre zone and the height of buildings development standard.
(F)
Conditions
2(a) and (b) were deleted as they conflicted with the designing with culture
process that informed the lift core tower and gate design, and the ongoing
cultural and community use of the building.
(G) Condition 32 was deleted as condition 33
requires the preparation of a Heritage Interpretation Plan and appropriate recognition
of the building’s history will be considered as part of the Plan along with the
cultural and community use of the building.
Carried unanimously.
D/2020/1158
Speakers
Mr Chris McBride (City
of Sydney) – on behalf of the applicant, and Mr Preston Peachey (City of
Sydney) – on behalf of the applicant.
Lead officer: Lucy Broadwell