Decision Maker: Central Sydney Planning Committee
Decision status: Recommendations Determined
Moved by the Chair (the Lord Mayor), seconded by Ms Abbie Galvin –
It is resolved that consent be granted to Section
4.55 Application No. strikethrough), as follows:
(2) APPROVED DEVELOPMENT
(a) Development consent is limited to a
concept plan building envelope and indicative land uses including office
premises, shops and ancillary car parking, in accordance with Development
Application No D/2019/686 dated 22 July 2019 D/2019/817 dated
1 August 2019 and the following drawings prepared by Hassell Bates
Smart:
Drawing
Number |
Drawing Name |
Date |
DA_1_0002 |
Building Envelope Street Elevations |
21
April 2021 |
DA_1_0003 |
Building Envelope Plans |
21
April 2021 |
DA_1_0003 |
Deep Soil Zone |
21
April 2021 |
and as amended by the conditions of this consent.
(b) In the event of any inconsistency between the approved plans and supplementary documentation, the plans will prevail.
(Amended – D/2019/686/A – 11 November 2021)
(4) DETAILED DESIGN
(a) The detailed design development application must address the following requirements:
(i) A deep soil zone with a minimum area of
297 288.4 sqm and minimum dimension of 3m must be provided
within the new property boundaries. Deep soil zones must be unencumbered by
structures within, above or below the zone, and must be adequately remediated
as necessary.
(ii) All elevations should be designed with at least two distinct building components each with its own architectural character, having regard to Section 4.2.4 of the Sydney DCP 2012.
(iii) The alignment of the street wall at the northern elevation is to match Geddes Avenue and address the street wall relationship with 338 Botany Road to the east.
(iv) Facade activation of all street facing elevations and through-site link to be developed further. O’Riordan Street in particular is to comply with Section 3.2.3 of the Sydney DCP 2012 with regard to active frontages.
(v) Any exposed blank walls should be provided with a visually interesting treatment of high quality design.
(vi) Any required substation is to be integrated into the fabric of the building and must not be a free standing kiosk substation. The substation should not compromise activation of the streetscape or public domain.
(vii) All roof level services are to be concealed within an integrated parapet wall. Enclosures and screening of any plant areas and essential services are to be of high quality material equal in standard to the facade.
(viii) The floor to ceiling heights and floor to floor heights must comply with the minimum heights specified in Section 4.2.1.1 of the Sydney DCP 2012.
(ix) The provision of green wall/s and roofs
should be explored in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.8.7.4 of the
Sydney DCP 2012. and
(x) External sun shading, including
passive shading, to any glazed elevations.
(xi) Appropriate privacy treatment must be
incorporated on the eastern elevation to protect the visual privacy of any
future residential developments to the east.
(b) The competitive design process brief shall incorporate the above design requirements.
(Amended – D/2019/686/A – 11 November
2021)
(7) BUILDING
HEIGHT
The maximum building height
including all roof top plant and equipment must not exceed the height of
the approved envelope as approved under Condition 2 of this consent. 12m
to Johnson Street and 22m to O’Riordan Street and Geddes Avenue as defined in
Sydney LEP 2012.
(Amended
– D/2019/686/A – 11 November 2021)
(14) THROUGH SITE LINK
Any Stage 2/Detailed Design
Development Application is to provide details of the location, dimensions
and stratum limits (if any) of the a through site link that addresses
the following requirements:
(a)
has a minimum width of 6 metres
and be open to the sky;
(b) be appropriately activated on the ground
plane;
(c) achieves the relevant wind comfort
criteria of Sydney Development Control Plan 2012; and
(d) be publicly accessible 24 hours a day.
The proposed
Through Site Link which will also be the subject of an Easement for
Public Access and associated Positive Covenant.
(Amended – D/2019/686/A – 11 November 2021)
The application was approved for the following reasons:
(A) The development, as modified, is substantially the same development as that originally approved and is consistent with Section 4.55(2)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
(B) The proposed modifications ensure that the detailed development application (D/2021/529) is consistent with the concept approval, in order to satisfy Section 4.24 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
(C) The proposal generally satisfies the objectives and relevant provisions of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 and Sydney Development Control Plan 2012. Where non-compliances exist, they have been demonstrated to be acceptable in the circumstances of the case.
(D) The modified building envelope can accommodate a building design which is capable of exhibiting design excellence in accordance with Clause 6.21 of the Sydney local Environmental Plan 2012.
(E) The increased height and bulk of the building envelope are in keeping with the desired future character of the area. These variations are reasonable and justified with regard to the concurrent detailed DA (D/2021/529).
(F) The changes to the approve building envelopes are appropriate and are not likely to significantly impact the overall use of the building or the amenity of surrounding sites or locality.
(G) The development, as amended, will remain consistent with the executed Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA/2019/16).
(H) The development as modified is in the public interest.
Carried unanimously.
D/2019/686/A
Report author: Bryan Li
Publication date: 12/11/2021
Date of decision: 11/11/2021
Decided at meeting: 11/11/2021 - Central Sydney Planning Committee
Accompanying Documents: