Moved by Councillor Ellsmore, seconded by
Councillor Scott -
It is resolved that:
(A)
Council note that:
(i)
the NSW
Government has announced proposed planning changes to encourage more low and
mid-rise housing near stations or centres. The proposed changes would apply to
approximately 80 per cent of the City of Sydney Local Government Area;
(ii)
the
changes would work, in part, by overriding existing council planning controls;
(iii)
the NSW
Government has announced that key aims of the proposed reforms are to improve
housing affordability and supply;
(iv)
in
response to the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure’s
release of an ‘Explanation of Intended Effects: Changes to create low and
mid-rise housing’, the City of Sydney Council endorsed a submission at its 19
February 2024 meeting;
(v)
the
City of Sydney’s submission outlines that the City of Sydney has achieved
significant increases in density through rezoning and existing targets in
recent years, is facilitating further growth in housing and supports National
Housing Accord growth targets; and
(vi)
however,
the City of Sydney’s submission identified that the proposed reforms are likely
to have perverse outcomes, including:
(a)
impacting
supply by slowing down approvals; and
(b)
impacting
Council’s ability to deliver affordable housing outcomes. Affordable housing
requirements are not included in the low and mid-rise planning reforms; and
(vii) at the recent Planning Minister meeting in February 2024, Councillor Scott attended and secured commitments “that in jurisdictions where planning powers reside with local governments, states and territories continue to develop transparent housing plans in collaboration with local government and support local governments to meet housing supply targets through local government planning policies and instruments”;
(B)
Council further note that:
(i)
the NSW
Government has not released modelling or data on how much their proposed
reforms are likely to increase land values and the cost of housing;
(ii)
when
land is rezoned or greater height or density is permitted, it increases the
value of land. A significant perverse outcome of the proposed planning reforms
is that they will likely increase the land values and housing prices for those
people who already own housing;
(iii)
this
has been demonstrated in areas where land in the City has been rezoned to allow
more height and density – even noting that the City has in place provisions to
capture some of that value and redirect it to affordable housing - provisions
would be bypassed under the proposed planning changes;
(iv)
residents in the City of Sydney
have already begun to receive inquiries from property developers offering to
buy their properties at or above market values, demonstrating that the
announcement of the proposed reforms has already increased the risk of further
increasing property prices;
(v)
depending
on the projected increase in land and housing values from the reforms, any
potential affordability gains from increasing supply could be dwarfed by
increase in land and housing values stimulated by the reforms;
(vi)
this
outcome would also have the effect of widening the gap in housing inequality
between existing home owners and investors, and those who do not own their own
home; and
(vii)
the NSW Upper House agreed to
establish an inquiry into the planning reforms, following a motion by Greens
MLA Sue Higginson on 23 February 2024;
(C)
the
Chief Executive Officer be requested to:
(i)
if practical, include
supplementary information to the City’s submission about the potential impact
on land values from the proposed reforms; and
(ii)
provide a submission or otherwise participate in
the NSW Parliament ‘Inquiry into the Development of the Transport Oriented Development
Program’; and
(D)
the Lord Mayor be requested to
write to the Premier, the Treasurer and the Minister for Planning and Public
Spaces to request the release of any modelling they have done regarding the
effects of the proposed planning changes on land and house prices.
The substantive motion, as varied by consent, was carried unanimously.
X086659