Decisions

Moved by the Chair (the Lord Mayor), seconded by Abbie Galvin –

It is resolved that:

(A)      the Central Sydney Planning Committee approve Planning Proposal - 232-240 Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, as shown at Attachment A to the subject report, to be submitted to the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces with a request for Gateway Determination;

(B)      the Central Sydney Planning Committee approve Planning Proposal - 232-240 Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, as shown at Attachment A to the subject report for public authority consultation and public exhibition in accordance with any conditions imposed under the Gateway Determination;

(C)      the Central Sydney Planning Committee note the recommendation to Council’s Transport, Heritage and Planning Committee on 25 March 2024 that Council seek authority from the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces to exercise the delegation of all the functions under section 3.36 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to make the local environmental plan and to put into effect Planning Proposal - 232-240 Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills;

(D)      the Central Sydney Planning Committee note the recommendation to Council’s Transport, Heritage and Planning Committee on 25 March 2024 that Council approve the Draft Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 - 232-240 Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, shown at Attachment B to the subject report for public authority consultation and public exhibition concurrent with the Planning Proposal;

(E)      authority be delegated to the Chief Executive Officer to make any variations to Planning Proposal - 232-240 Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, to correct any drafting errors or to ensure consistency with the Gateway Determination;

(F)      authority be delegated to the Chief Executive Officer to make any variations to Draft Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 - 232-240 Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, to correct any drafting errors or ensure it is consistent with the Planning Proposal following the Gateway Determination; and

(G)      the Central Sydney Planning Committee note the Chief Executive Officer will prepare a draft planning agreement in accordance with the letter of offer dated 13 March 2024 at Attachment C to the subject report, and the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, to be exhibited in accordance with the Act.

Carried unanimously.

X094617

Speaker

Giovanni Cirillo (Planning Lab) addressed the meeting of the Central Sydney Planning Committee on Item 6.

Moved by the Chair (the Lord Mayor), seconded by Councillor Worling –

It is resolved that the subject report be received and noted.

Carried unanimously.

S042755-02

 

Moved by the Chair (the Lord Mayor), seconded by Councillor Chan –

It is resolved that consent be granted to Section 4.56 Application Number D/2019/649/B subject to the conditions detailed in Attachment A to the subject report to the Central Sydney Planning Committee on 28 March 2024, subject to the following amendments (with additions shown in bold italics, further amendments in bold italic underlined, and deletions shown in bold strikethrough):

(2)        APPROVED DEVELOPMENT

(a)       Development must be in accordance with Development Application No. D/2019/649 dated 21 June 2019 and the following drawings prepared by Tzannes BVN:

Drawing Number	Drawing Name	Revision	Date
DA2-0001	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - 3D - WEST	7	23.03.21
DA2-0002	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - 3D - EAST	7	23.03.21
DA2-1001	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - BASEMENT 2 PLAN	8	23.03.21
DA2-1002	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - BASEMENT 1 PLAN	8	23.03.21
DA2-1003	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - LEVEL 1 PODIUM PLAN	10	23.03.21
DA2-1004	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - WATTLE LEVEL 2 FIG LEVEL 2 PLAN	9	23.03.21
DA2-1005	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - WATTLE LEVEL 3 FIG LEVEL 3 JONES LEVEL 2 PLAN	9	23.03.21
DA2-1006	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - WATTLE LEVEL 4 FIG LEVEL 3 JONES LEVEL 3 PLAN	9	23.03.21
DA2-1007	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - WATTLE LEVEL 5 FIG LEVEL 4 JONES LEVEL 4 PLAN	8	23.03.21
DA2-1008	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - WATTLE LEVEL 6 FIG LEVEL 5 JONES LEVEL 5 PLAN	8	23.03.21
DA2-1009	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - WATTLE LEVEL 7 FIG LEVEL 6 JONES LEVEL 6 PLAN	8	23.03.21
DA2-1010	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - WATTLE LEVEL 8 FIG LEVEL 7 JONES LEVEL 7 PLAN	9	30.03.21
DA2-1011	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - WATTLE LEVEL 9 FIG LEVEL 8 JONES LEVEL 8 PLAN	10	31.03.21
DA2-1012	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - ROOF PLAN	10	31.03.21
DA2-2001	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - ELEVATION -JONES STREET	9	31.03.21
DA2-2002	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - ELEVATION - FIG STREET	9	31.03.21
DA2-2003	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - ELEVATION - WATTLE STREET	9	31.03.21
DA2-2004	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - ELEVATION - LIGHT RAIL	9	31.03.21
DA2-2005	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - ELEVATION -STREETSCAPE	6	31.03.21
DA2-3001	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - SECTION A	9	31.03.21
DA2-3002	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - SECTION B	9	31.03.21
DA2-3003	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - SECTION C	10	31.03.21
DA2-3004	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - SECTION D	9	31.03.21
DA2-3005	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - SECTION E	9	31.03.21
DA2-3006	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - SECTION F	10	31.03.21
DA2-5000	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - JONES STREET	8	31.03.21
DA2-6000	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - THROUGH SITE LINKS	6	23.03.21
DA2-7000	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - ROOF FEATURES	6	23.03.21
DA2-8000	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - CLIFF	8	31.03.21
DA2-9500	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - ACOUSTIC	4	17.03.21
DA2-9600	COMMERCIAL BUILDING ARTICULATION	5	31.03.21
AR-DA-MOD-0001	CONCEPT ENVELOPE 3D WEST	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-0002	CONCEPT ENVELOPE 3D EAST	03	03/11/23
R-DA-MOD-1001	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 00	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1002	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 01	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1003	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 02	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1004	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 03	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1005	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 03 & LEVEL 04	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1006	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 04 & LEVEL 05	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1007	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 05 & LEVEL 06	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1008	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 06 & LEVEL 07	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1009	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 07 & LEVEL 08	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1010	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 08 & LEVEL 09	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1011	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 09 & LEVEL 10	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1012	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 10 & LEVEL 11	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1013	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 11 & LEVEL 12	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1014	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 13	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-1015	GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - LEVEL 14	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-2001	JONES ST ELEVATION	04	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-2002	JONES ST ELEVATION	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-2003	WATTLE ST ELEVATION	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-2004	LIGHT RAIL ELEVATION	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-2005	LIGHT RAIL ELEVATION	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-3001	SECTION A	04	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-3002	SECTION B	03	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-3003	SECTION C	04	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-3004	SECTION D	04	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-3005	SECTION E	04	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-3006	SECTION F	04	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-4001	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - JONES STREET	01	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-4002	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - THROUGH SITE LINKS	01	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-4003	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - ROOF FEATURES	01	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-4004	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - CLIFF	01	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-4005	CONCEPT ENVELOPE - ACOUSTIC	01	03/11/23
AR-DA-MOD-4006	COMMERCIAL BUILDING ARTICULATION	01	03/11/23

(b)       and as amended by the conditions of this consent.

In the event of any inconsistency between the approved concept development plans and other supplementary documentation, the approved concept development plans will prevail.

(3)        MATTERS NOT APPROVED IN CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT CONSENT

The following matters are not approved and do not form part of this concept development consent:

(a)       The use for any part of the building envelopes for residential accommodation. The buildings may only be used for residential accommodation and identified as such in a detailed design development application on demonstration that acoustic amenity and natural ventilation are achieved simultaneously in accordance with Objectives 4B-1 and 4J of the Apartment Design Guide (ADG). Should suitable design resolution not be achieved, the use of some of all of the buildings are to revert to non-residential use or non-permanent use in a future detailed design development application.

(b)       The pedestrian connection to the Wentworth Park Light Rail Station (and any associated tree removal). In principle approval is required from Sydney Trains for any future pedestrian connection to the Wentworth Park Light Rail Station (and any associated tree removal) prior to the commencement of the competitive design process.

(c)       The location and design of the pedestrian access zone as illustrated on the concept plan drawings DA2-1006 Rev 9, DA2-1007 Rev 8, DA2-1012 Rev 10 and DA2-8000 Rev 8 on the Jones Street frontage of the site.

(d)       Any works, including demolition, excavation and/or construction.

(e)       The removal or pruning of any tree on the site.

(f)        The siting and location of a substation.

(g)       The number of basement levels, car parking spaces, bicycle spaces, car share spaces and loading spaces/zones.

(h)       The precise total quantum, ratio and distribution of commercial, recreation, child care centre and residential floor space.

(i)         The indicative floor layouts of buildings.

(j)        The floor or ceiling levels of each storey.

(k)       The number and configuration of residential apartments and commercial tenancies.

(l)        Up to 10% design excellence uplift in building height or floor space ratio.

(5)     DETAILED DESIGN OF BUILDINGS

The drawings lodged for the competitive design process brief and detailed design development application must incorporate the following requirements:

(a)       Amended Fig Block building envelope showing the following:

(i)        Commercial Levels 4, 5 and 6: The setback to the Jones Street site frontage (as   shown on DA2-1007_8, DA2-1008_8 and DA2-1009_8) is to be increased by at least 3.2m. The Jones Street footpath is to be extended to the face of the realigned commercial levels, with opportunities provided for public views down to the rockface below;

(ii)      Residential Level 7 (and up to 10% additional height subject to design excellence): Provide a minimum setback of 4m from the Commercial Level 6 street wall height on the Jones Street site frontage;

(iii)     Residential Level 7 balustrade/planter zone: Provide a minimum setback of 1.3m to the balustrade/ planter zone from the realigned Jones Street street-wall (generally in accordance with that shown on DA2-1010_9, DA2-1011_10, DA2- 20002_9 and DA2-3003_10); and

(iv)     Level 7 Residential communal open space: Retain the residential communal open space shown on DA2-1010_9 and relocate it to the western end of the Fig Block (Level 7).

(a)     Amended Building C – Courtyard building envelope showing the following:

(i)      The Plant Room Equipment and Parapet Zone height (and any other structures at Level 13 of Building C – Courtyard) is to be reduced by at least 2m (to a maximum of RL 43.55 (AHD)).

(b)     A new footpath and street tree planting along the site’s frontage to Jones Street, as required by condition 12 below.

(c)     Areas nominated as deep soil zones must be designed as actual deep soil throughout the competitive design process and detailed design development application. Deep soil zones must be unencumbered by built elements above and below. This includes basements, through site links and other paved areas.

(d)     Tree planting must be able to provide a minimum of 15% canopy cover across the site within 10 years of completion.

(Condition amended – 28 March 2024)

(7)        BUILDING HEIGHT

The maximum heights of the building envelopes, as defined in Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012, are:

(a)     Jones Block:

(i)     RL 35.700 (AHD) to the Communal roof terrace zone for lift overrun and pergola structures

(ii)    RL 32.400 (AHD) to the Level 8 Communal roof terrace balustrade/planter zone

(iii)   RL 31.400 (AHD) to the Level 7 Residential Roof

(iv)   RL 29.000 (AHD) to the Level 7 balustrade/planter zone

(v)    RL 28.00 (AHD) to the Level 6 Residential Roof

(b)     Fig Block:

(vi)    RL 32.550 (AHD) to the Level 7 Residential Roof

(vii)  RL 30.150 (AHD) to the Level 7 balustrade/planter zone and Communal roof terrace balustrade/planter zone facing Jones Street, Fig Street and Wattle Street

(viii) RL 29.150 (AHD) to the roof of Level 6 Commercial Roof

(c)     Wattle Block:

(i)     RL 35.950 (AHD) to the Level 9 Residential Roof

(ii)    RL 33.550 (AHD) to the Level 9 balustrade/planter zone facing Wattle Street

(iii)   RL 32.550 (AHD) to the Level 8 Residential Roof

(iv)   RL 30.150 (AHD) to the Level 8 balustrade/planter zone facing Wattle Street

(v)    RL 29.150 (AHD) to the roof of Level 7 Residential Roof

(d)     Café/retail building: RL 11.150 (AHD) to the roof.

(a)     Building A – Retail Pavilion:

(i)      RL 10.75 (AHD) to the roof

(ii)     RL 11.05 (AHD) to the parapet wall

(b)     Building B - Jones Street:

(i)      RL 37.100 (AHD) to the PV array on top of plant and lift overrun

(ii)     RL 36.600 (AHD) and RL 36.800 (AHD) to the top of plant and lift overrun

(iii)   RL 35.10 (AHD) to the Level 10 roof

(c)     Building C - Courtyard:

(i)      RL 43.55 45.55 (AHD) to the Plant Room Equipment and Parapet Zone

(ii)     RL 42.35 (AHD) to the Level 12 roof

(iii)   RL 39.45 (AHD) to the Level 09 parapet

(d)     Building D - Wattle Street:

(i)      RL 36.450 (AHD) to the PV array

(ii)     RL 36.250 (AHD) to the Level 11 roof

(iii)    RL 32.750 (AHD) to the Level 10 roof

(iv)    RL 30.850 (AHD) to the Level 09 balustrade/planter zone

(v)     RL 29.550 (AHD) to the Level 09 roof

(e)     Building E - Fig Street:

(i)      RL 37.950 (AHD) to the top of plant and lift overrun

(ii)     RL 36.350 (AHD) to the Level 10 roof

(iii)    RL 32.350 (AHD) to the Level 09 roof and RL (AHD) 33.550 to the Level 09 parapet

(iv)    RL 29.150 (AHD) to the Level 08 roof and RL (AHD) 29.950 to the Level 08 parapet

The maximum heights shown above are inclusive of additional height approved pursuant to the provisions of Clause 6.21D(3) of Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012. The development is not eligible for any additional height under any circumstances.

Notwithstanding clause (a) and (b) above, the Jones Block and Fig Block may be eligible for up to 10% additional height pursuant to the provisions of Clause 6.21(7) of Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 if the consent authority is satisfied that the resulting detailed design development application exhibits design excellence and is the result of a competitive design process.

(12)      PUBLIC DOMAIN CONDITION

(a)       Prior to any competitive design process, a Public Domain Concept Plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified architect, urban designer, landscape architect and engineer. The plan must show all existing and proposed public domain.

(a)       The Public Domain Plan and Levels and Gradients are to include detailed sections sufficient to show how the footway, tree and verge planting will be delivered along the length of Jones Street. A footway of not less than 1.2m in width is to be provided from the kerb along the width of Jones Street. The Sections need to be from the centre line of Jones Street to the internal floor of the buildings and clearly show access, retaining structures and any engineering information to demonstrate the proposal is feasible and deliverable.

(b)       The final Public Domain Concept Plan shall be submitted as part of the documentation submitted as part of the detailed design development application.

(14)   LANDSCAPING OF THE SITE

(a)       The detailed design development application must include a Landscape Concept Plan and Landscape Design Statement prepared by a qualified landscape architect or landscape designer.

(b)       The Landscape Concept Plan and Landscape Design Statement detailed design development application must:

(i)        Clarify the vision and design principles for all landscaping to achieve design excellence in accordance with Clause 6.21 of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 and the integration of landscape design.

(ii)       Identify any site, landscape, streetscape, heritage view and/or planning constraints, including (but not limited to), microclimate, ground contamination, existing levels, services and easements, existing trees, landscape features, landscape setbacks and screening/buffer requirements.

(iii)      Identify the location of deep soil areas, tree planting, communal open spaces, green roofs and walls, sustainable design measures including water sensitive urban design treatments, sustainability targets and direct sunlight to communal and private open spaces.

(iv)      Quantify and illustrate landscape design compliance with the relevant codes including Parts 3 and 4 of the Apartment Design Guide, Section 4.2.3 of the Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 and Sydney Landscape Code Volume 2.

(v)       Tree planting that will provide a minimum of 15% canopy cover across the site within 10 years of completion.

(vi)      Provide deep soil zones to a minimum area of 7% of the total site area, with a minimum dimension of 6 metres.

(c)       The Landscape Concept Plan and Landscape Design Statement must establish a clear commitment to designing landscape sustainably and in an integrated manner and demonstrate that the function and aesthetic of both the landscape and the building have been considered concurrently in relation to each other.

(d)       The requirements noted above in (a) through (c) inclusive must be included in the competition brief for the competitive design process.

(22)   PARKING DESIGN

The design, layout, signage, line marking, lighting and physical controls of all off-street car parking facilities is to generally satisfy the Australian Standard AS/NZS 2890.1 - 2004 Parking facilities Part 1: Off-street car parking and Australian Standard AS/NZS 2890.2 - 2002 Parking facilities Part 2: Off-street commercial vehicle facilities and Australian Standard AS/NZS 2890.6 - 2009 Parking facilities Part 6: Off-street parking for people with disabilities. The design must be provided as part of the detailed design development application.

(30)   TREE PROTECTION PLANS AND DETAILED DESIGN APPLICATION

All detailed architectural, building, engineering (structural, stormwater and drainage services) and landscape documentation submitted as part of the detailed design development application shall clearly show on all drawings the retention of all existing trees recommended for retention in the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report prepared by ‘Earthscape Horticultural Services’ (Report No. 22-069, Version 11, dated 6th February 2023) and Addendum [1] (dated 11 October 2023) and Addendum 2 dated 14 February 2024 dated 3 September 2019 (Version 6) dated 3 September 2019 (Version 6), including the position of their trunks, full diameter of their canopies, Structural Root Zones (SRZs) and Tree Protection Zones (TPZs)

(31)   STREET TREES AND DETAILED DESIGN APPLICATION

(a)     All existing street trees surrounding the site which are recommended for retention in the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report prepared by ‘Earthscape Horticultural Services’ (Report No. 22-069, Version 11, dated 6th February 2023), Addendum [1] (dated 11 October 2023) and Addendum 2 dated 14 February 2024 dated 3 September 2019 (Version 6) must be included for retention with any subsequent detailed design development application subject to the following amendment:

(i)      Retain Tree 46 (London Plane tree)

(b)     Any design elements (awnings, street furniture, footpath upgrades etc) within the public domain must ensure appropriate setbacks are provided from the street tree to ensure ongoing retention and allow the maturity of new tree to be achieved.

(c)     The location of any new driveways shall ensure it does not require the removal of any existing street trees which are recommended for retention in the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report prepared by ‘Earthscape Horticultural Services’ (Report No. 22-069, Version 11, dated 6th February 2023) Addendum [1] (dated 11 October 2023) and Addendum 2 dated 14 February 2024 dated 3 September 2019 (Version 6) as amended by (a) above. The driveway shall be appropriately setback so as it does not have any adverse below or above ground impacts for any existing street trees which are to be retained.

(d)     A pruning specification prepared by a qualified Arborist (minimum AQF 5) muct must be submitted with detailed design development application. Pruning of any street tree must not exceed more than 15% overall canopy with a maximum branch diameter of 100mm will be permitted by Council.

Reasons for Decision

The modification application is approved by the independent external planning consultant for the following reasons:

(A)      The development as modified is substantially the same as the development originally approved and is consistent with the requirements of section 4.56(1)(a) of the EPA Act.

(B)      The development has been considered against the reasons given by the Land and Environment Court for the grant of the consent that is to be modified, and the proposal is consistent and acceptable, as per section 4.56(1A) of the EPA Act.

(C)      The proposed modifications ensure that the detailed design development application will be consistent with the concept consent to satisfy section 4.24 of the EPA Act.

(D)      Subject to conditions, the increased height and bulk of the building envelopes generally reflects the architectural design competition winning scheme and will not adversely impact the amenity of the surrounding area. These modifications are reasonable and justified with regard to the detailed design development application.

(E)      The proposed building envelopes are capable of accommodating a future building design which is capable of exhibiting design excellence in accordance with clause 6.21D of the Sydney LEP 2012.

Carried unanimously.

D/2019/649/B

Speaker

Stephen Kerr (Gyde) addressed the meeting of the Central Sydney Planning Committee on Item 4.

Moved by the Chair (the Lord Mayor), seconded by Councillor Worling –

It is resolved that:

(A)      the variation requested to clause 4.3 'Height of buildings' development standard in accordance with clause 4.6 'Exceptions to development standards' of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 be upheld, noting that the Central Sydney Planning Committee has considered the additional information and plans relating to the rooftop plant and parapet zone of Building C; and

(B)      consent be granted to Development Application Number D/2023/97 subject to the conditions set out in Attachment A to the subject report to the Central Sydney Planning Committee on 28 March 2024, subject to the following amendments (additions shown in bold italics, deletions shown in strikethrough):

(2)       DESIGN MODIFICATIONS

The design of the building must be modified as follows:

(a)       Building C - Courtyard: The Plant Room Equipment and Parapet Zone height (and any other structures at Level 13 of Building C – Courtyard) is to be reduced by at least 2m (to a maximum of RL 43.55 (AHD).

(a)       Child care centre (simulated outdoor space): Vegetable gardens or gardening tubs are to be included within the simulated outdoor spaces.

The modifications are to be submitted to and approved by Council’s Director City Planning, Development and Transport prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

Reason

To require amendments to the approved plans and supporting documentation following assessment of the development.

(3)       BUILDING HEIGHT

The height of each building must not exceed the following RLs (AHD):

(a)       Building A – Retail Pavilion:

(i)         RL 10.75 (AHD) to the roof

(ii)        RL 11.05 (AHD) to the parapet wall

(b)       Building B - Jones Street:

(i)         RL 37.100 (AHD) to the PV array on top of plant and lift overrun

(ii)        RL 36.600 (AHD) and RL 36.800 (AHD) to the top of plant and lift overrun

(iii)      RL 35.10 (AHD) to the Level 10 roof

(c)       Building C - Courtyard:

(i)         RL 43.55 45.55 (AHD) to the Plant Room Equipment and Parapet Zone

(ii)        RL 42.35 (AHD) to the Level 12 roof

(iii)      RL 39.45 (AHD) to the Level 09 parapet

(d)       Building D - Wattle Street:

(i)         RL 36.450 (AHD) to the PV array

(ii)        RL 36.250 (AHD) to the Level 11 roof parapet

(iii)      RL 32.750 (AHD) to the Level 10 roof

(iv)      RL 30.850 (AHD) to the Level 09 balustrade/planter zone

(v)       RL 29.550 (AHD) to the Level 09 roof

(e)       Building E - Fig Street:

(i)         RL 37.950 (AHD) to the top of plant and lift overrun

(ii)        RL 36.350 (AHD) to the Level 10 roof

(iii)      RL 32.350 (AHD) to the Level 09 roof and RL (AHD) 33.550 to the Level 09 parapet

(iv)      RL 29.150 (AHD) to the Level 08 roof and RL (AHD) 29.950 to the Level 08 parapet

Prior to an Occupation Certificate being issued, a Registered Surveyor must provide certification that the height of the building accords with (a) above, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifier.

Reason

To ensure the constructed development complies with the approved height.

(11)    SECTION 7.11 CONTRIBUTIONS PAYABLE - CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS PUBLIC AMENITIES – CITY OF SYDNEY DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN 2015 – WEST PRECINCT

Council has identified the development will increase demand for public amenities and facilities. Pursuant to Section 7.11 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (as amended), and the City of Sydney Development Contributions Plan 2015 the following monetary contributions are required towards the cost of public amenities.

Contribution Category                                                        Amount

Open Space                                              $4,799,539.18 $4,715,612.78

Community Facilities                                 $1,464,509.68 $1,442,913.18

Traffic and Transport                                 $27,142.56       $26,062.73

Stormwater Drainage                                                          nil

Total                                                          $6,291,191.42 $6,184,588.69

The City of Sydney will index the above contribution for inflation at the time of payment using the following formula.

Cpayment           = Cconsent x (CPIpayment ÷ CPIconsent)

Where:

Cpayment           = Is the contribution at time of payment;

Cconsent             = Is the contribution at the time of consent, as shown above;

CPIpayment        = Is the Consumer Price Index (All Groups Index) for Sydney published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics that applies at the time of payment; and

CPI1consent          = Is the Consumer Price Index (All Groups Index) for  Sydney at the date the contribution amount above was calculated being – 136.4 for the December 2023.

The contribution must be paid prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate in relation to this development.

Please contact Council’s Planning Administration staff at planningsystemsadmin@cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au to request a letter confirming the indexed contribution amount payable.

Once the letter confirming the indexed contribution is obtained, payment may be made at any of the City’s Neighbourhood Service Centres or the One Stop Shop at Town Hall House. Acceptable payment methods are EFTPOS (debit card only), cash (up to 10K only), Credit Card (up to 50K only) or a bank cheque made payable to the City of Sydney. Personal or company cheques will not be accepted.

Reason

To ensure development contributions are paid to address the increased demand for public amenities and services resulting from the approved development.

(44)    TREES APPROVED FOR REMOVAL

(a)     All trees detailed in Table 1 below are approved for removal. Tree removal must not occur until the Construction Certificate has been issued.

Table 1 – Tree Removal:

Tree No	Species:	Location
1 - 5	Platanus orientalis (Oriental Plane)	On-site
6	Lagerstomia indica (Crepe myrtle)	On-site
7	Celtis sinensis (Chinese Hackberry)	On-site
8 - 11	Platanus orientalis (Oriental Plane)	On-site
12-14	Celtis sinensis (Chinese Hackberry)	On-site
15	Ficus rubiginosa (Port Jackson Fig)	On-site
16 - 21	Celtis sinensis (Chinese Hackberry)	On-site
22	Pittosperum undulatum (Sweet Pittosperum)	On-site
23	Olea europaea (African Olive)	On-site
24 - 30	Celtis sinensis (Chinese Hackberry)	On-site
31	Ficus rubiginosa (Port Jackson Fig)	On-site
32-36	Casaurina cunninghamii (River Oak)	Road Reserve – Fig St
37	Casuarina glauca (Swamp Oak)	Road Reserve – Fig St
38 – 39, 40	Platanus orientalis (Oriental Plane)	Road Reserve – Fig St
48	Tristaniopsis laurina (Water Gum)	Road Reserve – Wattle St
49	Populus simonii (Chinese Poplar)	Road Reserve – Wattle St
50 -51	Melaleuca quinquenervia (Broadleaved Paperbark)	Road Reserve – Wattle St
52	Populus simonii (Chinese Poplar)	Road Reserve – Wattle St
53	Tristaniopsis laurina (Water Gum)	Road Reserve – Wattle St
54	Melaleuca quinquenervia (Broadleaved Paperbark)	Road Reserve – Wattle St
55	Populus simonii (Chinese Poplar)	Road Reserve – Wattle St
56	Koelreutaria paniculata (Golden Rain Tree)	Rail Corridor
97	Syzygium paniculatum (Magenta Cherry)	Rail Corridor
99	Syzygium paniculatum (Magenta Cherry)	Rail Corridor

 

(b)     All tree removal works must be carried out by an arborist with a minimum AWF Level 3 qualification in arboriculture in accordance with SafeWork’s Code of Practice – Amenity Tree Industry.

Reason

To identify the trees that can be removed.

(45)    TREES THAT MUST BE RETAINED

The existing trees detailed in Table 2 below be retained and protected in accordance with the conditions throughout construction and development.

Table 2 – Tree Retention:

Approval is NOT granted for the removal of the following trees, which Council has determined to be prominent landscape elements.

Tree No	Species:	Location
40 41 - 47	Platanus orientalis (Oriental Plane)	Road Reserve – Fig St
57 - 58	Koelreutaria paniculata (Golden Rain Tree)	Rail Corridor
59	Tristaniopsis laurina (Water Gum)	Rail Corridor
60	Koelreutaria paniculata (Golden Rain Tree)	Rail Corridor
61	Tristaniopsis laurina (Water Gum)	Rail Corridor
62	Koelreutaria paniculata (Golden Rain Tree)	Rail Corridor
63	Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum)	Rail Corridor
64	Callistemon viminalis (Weeping Bottlebrush)	Rail Corridor
65	Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum)	Rail Corridor
66	Banksia integrifolia (Coast Banksia)	Rail Corridor
67	Eucalyptus punctata (Grey Gum)	Rail Corridor
68 - 70	Syzygium paniculatum (Magenta Cherry)	Rail Corridor
71	Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum)	Rail Corridor
72	Casuarina cunninghamiana (River Oak)	Rail Corridor
73 - 75	Syzygium paniculatum (Magenta Cherry)	Rail Corridor
76	Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox)	Rail Corridor
77 - 80	Casuarina cunninghamiana (River Oak)	Rail Corridor
81 - 82	Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum)	Rail Corridor
83	Banksia integrifolia (Coast Banksia)	Rail Corridor
84	Polyscias elegans (Celery Tree)	Rail Corridor
85 - 86	Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum)	Rail Corridor
87	Melaleuca styphelioides (Prickly Paperbark)	Rail Corridor
88 - 89	Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum)	Rail Corridor
90 - 109	Syzygium paniculatum (Magenta Cherry)	Rail Corridor

 

Reason

To identify the trees that cannot be removed, must be retained and protected.

(141)  COMPLIANCE WITH ARBORIST’S REPORT

All recommendations Tree Protection Plans and Methodology Statements contained in the approved Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report prepared by Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report prepared by ‘Earthscape Horticultural Services’ (Report No. 22-069, Version 11, dated 6th February 2023), Addendum [1] (dated 11 October 2023) and Addendum 2 dated 14 February 2024, must be implemented during the demolition, construction and use of the development subject to the following amendment:

(a)       Retain Tree 40 (Oriental Plane Tree)

(a)       Retain Tree 46 (London Plane tree).

During the erection of scaffolding for Tree 40 and Tree 46, Council’s Tree Management Officer and the Project Arborist are to inspect the trees prior to any pruning taking place to provide reach joint agreement on specific branches to be pruned and the points that the branches should be reduced to.

Reason

To ensure that works affecting trees are carried out in an appropriate manner and in accordance with the approved arborist’s report.

Reasons for Decision

The application is approved by the independent external planning consultant for the following reasons:

(A)      The applicant’s written request has adequately addressed the matters required to be demonstrated by clause 4.6(3) of the Sydney LEP 2012, being that compliance with the height of buildings development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary, there are sufficient planning grounds to justify contravening clause 4.3 of Sydney LEP 2012 and it is in the public interest because it is consistent with the objectives of Zone MU1 - Mixed Use and the height of buildings development standard.

(B)      It has been assessed against the aims and objectives of the relevant planning controls including SEPP 65, Sydney LEP 2012 and Sydney DCP 2012. Where non-compliances exist, they have been demonstrated to be acceptable in the circumstances of the case or can be resolved by the recommended conditions of consent.

(C)      It is consistent with the modified concept consent for the site, being D/2019/649/B, satisfying section 4.24 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (EPA Act).

(D)      It is generally consistent with the design intent of the winning scheme of a competitive design process. The scale, form, articulation, materiality and architectural contribution of the proposed development is consistent with Sydney DCP 2012 and the proposed development is consistent with the desired future character of the locality. The development satisfies design excellence provisions pursuant to clause 6.21D of Sydney LEP 2012.

(E)      It is appropriate within its setting and is a mixed-use development comprising compatible uses that will support the vitality of the area, consistent with the desired future character for the locality.

Carried unanimously.

D/2023/97

Speaker

Stephen Kerr (Gyde) addressed the meeting of the Central Sydney Planning Committee on Item 5.